Showing posts with label Revolution. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Revolution. Show all posts

Friday, January 2, 2015

Thou Shalt Submit [part one] ...

No, there isn’t any text in scripture that plainly states “thou shalt submit”; perhaps because submission, like love and forgiveness, should also be a freewill choice.  The entirety of the gospel shows us that as we submit to Christ, He transforms our will, our desires, our thinking, our motives, and our actions into His own likeness.  In this we come to realize that submitting to Christ means letting go of even “who” we are to Him to be remade.  We come to realize that we are putting aside what “we want”, in order for Him to change what “we want” into something else, something better.  We come to realize that death-to-self through Christ, becomes a rebirth into a world we can hardly imagine.  When our self-love is taken from us, and replaced with love for others, our perspectives change.  Instead of constantly thinking about how my next words or actions will benefit me, I begin to think how my next words or actions will benefit someone else. 
It is easier to serve someone else, who I have a special regard for, perhaps my wife, or parents, or children.  A little less easy, but it is still possible to serve my in-laws, cousins, extended family, or closest friends.  In short, we develop a pecking-order of those who we love most, down to those we don’t love so much.  And for nearly all of us, George W. Bush, or Barrack Obama scarcely make the list.  Neither does the policeman who pulls us over to write a well-deserved traffic ticket, or the civil court judge who imposes a penalty we would have all too much wanted to avoid.  Authority figures, scarcely ever make the list, of those who we hold in a special regard, and those we love above all others.  We are sort of forced into submitting to their authority and often we resent it.  We have to pay our taxes which support programs we disagree with, or face the penalty of tax evasion if we refuse.  There are penalties that always come with disobedience to authority figures.  When the penalties get “too high” rebellion looms.  Slaves will revolt to gain their freedom; the oppressed will rise up to break the yoke of oppression.  And we Americans cheer this phenomenon as “natural” and “right”.  We value independence, and “justice” for all, even if it must be earned at the point of a sword.
Sadly, many Christians are first and loudest in the call to end injustice through means of violence.  Recent events regarding potential police over-reactions have incited many to take up the clarion call of “no justice, no peace”.  Violence breaks out in communities that can least afford its damaging effects.  We inflict more pain upon each other completely negating the call for reform, and providing justification for the restraining force used against the violence displayed.  This self-destructive cycle accomplishes nothing.  And the injustice faced in our day while very real, is also very limited in scope compared to ages past.  In the days prior to the civil war in this country, “black lives mattered” only in as much as any piece of property owned by the wealthy.  A few hundred years ago, “white lives mattered” only in as much as they agreed with the religion in power, and served the will of the king.  In the days of Peter, “slave lives mattered” not at all, whether white, black, brown, or otherwise.  Roman authority was still absolute, completely corrupt, and fully unbreakable.  Disobedience in the days of Peter carried more penalties than mere financial fines, in his day, the penalty was often very severe and could spread to family and loved ones with no regard for justice, or equity.
Looking objectively at the political conditions in which Peter lived, through our current lens as Americans, we would have encouraged an organized revolution over the oppressive tyranny of Roman Rule.  We call out conditions in North Korea, or Iran, or Sudan as being so horrible that a “regime” change is needed to restore basic “human rights”.  Peter lived under a regime that was far more ruthless, and far more corrupt, and far more universal.  Decentralized authority figures such as provincial governors had the backing of roman garrisons at their command.  The local “police force” were trained killers who had ZERO rules for violent engagement.  Should a local Roman Soldier kill you, or cut off a limb, simply because you were in the wrong place at the wrong time, you had no recourse.  Your meaningless death was not given a second thought, and should your family complain or protest your innocence, they could be immediately slaughtered or sold into slavery.  As Americans, we cannot imagine living under such conditions.  For us, this would have required “liberty or death”.  And those of like mind in the Roman age found death 1000 times more often than any liberty.
But what Peter had to say about living under these oppressive and corrupt conditions boggles the mind of American Christians today, because he said things none of “us” want to hear, let alone do.  In his first letter chapter 2, and verse 11 he begins … “Dearly beloved, I beseech you as strangers and pilgrims, abstain from fleshly lusts, which war against the soul; [verse 12] Having your conversation honest among the Gentiles: that, whereas they speak against you as evildoers, they may by your good works, which they shall behold, glorify God in the day of visitation.”  First, his readers are not just an audience, they are “dearly loved”.  Our God has offered us everything, even His own life, in exchange for ours so that we might live in a world after this one.  Remembering this level of love for us is important in facing a world steeped in evil.  Next Peter again reminds us, that we are strangers and pilgrims in this world of evil.  After our transformation begins in submitting to Christ, what used to be natural to us, becomes foreign to us.  Peter’s advice then, is to avoid “fleshy lusts”.  Whether he refers to extravagant dietary delicacies, or scantily clad places of disrepute, the advice is the same – avoid indulging self and building appetites of self-indulgence.
But beyond avoiding things that would teach us to please self, our conversations, our words, our speech should also be honest.  Even though we deal with perpetual liars, we are not to engage in their practices.  Even though we deal with perpetual gossips, we are not to participate in gossip.  By contrast, while Gentiles (or those who refuse to believe in Christ yet) are speaking constant evil of us, we speak nothing but love in their regard.  While we are cheated, we do not cheat others in return.  It is our display of love even under these completely unfair conditions that mark us as being changed by Christ.  For only God could so change a human heart, that it would be willing to love during conditions of unfair oppression.  The natural response is to rebel.  The Christ centered response is to return love for evil.  Peter does NOT take up the banner of “no justice, no peace”.  Instead Peter advises taking up the banner of “love and honesty in the face of evil”.  True reform cannot be brought about through violence.  For while we might be able to compel the hands and feet, we do not ever change the heart that motivates them through acts of violent suppression.  Love however, can change the heart, which in turn changes the actions of the hands and feet.
Peter continues in verse 13 … “Submit yourselves to every ordinance of man for the Lord's sake: whether it be to the king, as supreme; [verse 14] Or unto governors, as unto them that are sent by him for the punishment of evildoers, and for the praise of them that do well.”  Peter here ups the ante.  Not only are we to submit to Christ to be remade, we are also to submit our own will to those who are in authority.  We are to obey “every ordinance of man” for the Lord’s sake.  Not just the king, but his corrupt governors, and officers sent by the governor – we are to obey them all for the Lord’s sake.  You can imagine these were not popular words in the days of Peter, and they are no more popular now.  The idea that we should have to submit to unfair conditions, in an unjust system, run by worldly loving pagans, who would just as soon kill us as look at us, hardly seems like the course any would “want” to pursue.  Yet Peter outlines exactly this course of action – do not rebel, instead submit and further offer love in response to the evil you face.
Peter understands the end-game.  Peter gets the strategy outlined by God to be rid of sin and evil once and for all – you have to love it to death.  God had, and has, the power to simply kill all evil everywhere it exists.  But He does not; because evil cannot be killed or eradicated through violence.  To see evil eliminated, those who engage in it must choose to want something else.  They will never make that choice without a reason, and without a better alternative.  Love is that reason.  Love provides that better alternative.  Peter will never conquer the Roman Empire through force of arms.  Those guys were professional killers.  But melt the heart of that killer soldier with love, and he becomes a soldier in the army of God, looking to redeem lives, not take them any longer.  Peter was not advocating that the authorities in power were “right” or fair or just.  Peter knows they are corrupt, he knows they are governed by hate and greed.  This is NOT an endorsement of the evil empire.  It is however a strategy that can succeed against evil as only love can.  Our submission to Christ first, enables us to submit ourselves even when conditions are unfair to earthly authority.  We need not disobey our God to follow the will of men, but where the edicts of men are merely unpalatable and unfair; our love in the face of their evil has the only chance of seeing reform come to pass.
 Peter continues in verse 15 … “For so is the will of God, that with well doing ye may put to silence the ignorance of foolish men: [verse 16] As free, and not using your liberty for a cloke of maliciousness, but as the servants of God. [verse 17] Honour all men. Love the brotherhood. Fear God. Honour the king.”  Peter here ups the ante again.  For in his advice to submit to earthly authorities, he now adds that this is the very “will of God”.  So many Adventists are content to proclaim the need to obey the commandments of God, yet nearly zero folks espouse complete submission to corrupt earthly authorities as being the will of God.  Peter accurately records the effects of this behavior, it puts to silence the ignorance of foolish men.  The only stark contrast to evil is love.  When we show love in response to evil, it dumbfounds those who witness it.  It is not natural to see love offered in response to evil.  It is supernatural.  It is Christ powered.  It is Christ based. 
Peter tells us to act this way BECAUSE we are ALREADY free.  Our liberty, is the liberty from sin, and the slavery and chains of self-love.  We have already been made free by Christ from choosing to always act in our own best interest.  We are instead free to act in the interests of others.  We are not to misuse our own freedom to act maliciously against others, knowing we would be forgiven of our misdeeds.  Instead we are to remember we were made free to “serve”.  We are “servants” of God.  We serve others like He serves others.  We love our enemies, like He loved us before we were His own.  Peter goes further, in his admonition, that we should Honor ALL men.  Peter tells us to give respect and honor to ALL men, not just the ones we like, or the ones we agree with, or the ones who are nice to us.  Instead we are honor ALL men, whether they deserve honor or not.  We are to honor the police officer who has just over-reacted and taken the life of someone who may not have deserved this fate.  We are to return love to that officer, despite what pain he may have caused.  It is only love that will ever bring peace.  It is only love that will ever bring repentance.  It is only love that will ever bring reform.
We are to “love” the brotherhood.  We are to respect our God.  And we are to Honor our king, or our governmental authorities.  It is love alone that will change our world.  It is love alone that can once and for all time, see evil eliminated.  Violence only begets violence.  Humility allows us to reflect love instead of demanding justice.  Submission demonstrates that we are willing to place our own needs and desires behind those of another.  Submission is not an act of cowardice, rather it is an act of one fully willing to release control, willing to yield that control - for the benefit of another.  God has all the power in the universe, and chooses NOT to use that power to force us into submission.  Rather he offers us love, and offers us freedom, but only if we choose to accept it.  God does not use power and control to achieve submission, He uses love alone. 
Peter continues in verse 18 … “Servants, be subject to your masters with all fear; not only to the good and gentle, but also to the froward. [verse 19] For this is thankworthy, if a man for conscience toward God endure grief, suffering wrongfully. [verse 20] For what glory is it, if, when ye be buffeted for your faults, ye shall take it patiently? but if, when ye do well, and suffer for it, ye take it patiently, this is acceptable with God.”  Peter once again raises the stakes.  Servants are advised to serve their masters with great respect, whether they are good and gentle, or whether they are not.  We are to treat the “deserving” and the non-deserving equally.  Those bound into service, whether by consent, or by the chains of unjust oppression, are to serve in love regardless.  Again, this is NOT an endorsement of the practice of slavery.  It is however, a proscription of how to act when one is forced into the conditions of slavery.  We are to act with love even if we are persecuted for how we act.  It is of little value to be criticized for the truth of our shortcomings, for we rightly earn disdain for actions taken in self-love.  But to suffer wrongfully, for acts of love to others, is to emulate the sufferings of Christ.
Peter now offers the proof of his assertions in the example of our Lord as he writes in verse 21 … “For even hereunto were ye called: because Christ also suffered for us, leaving us an example, that ye should follow his steps: [verse 22] Who did no sin, neither was guile found in his mouth: [verse 23] Who, when he was reviled, reviled not again; when he suffered, he threatened not; but committed himself to him that judgeth righteously:”  Jesus, who was perfect, and deserved no persecution, was reviled of men.  They railed against Christ, hurling accusation after accusation; but Jesus did not return to them what they deserved.  When they beat Christ, or threw stones at Him, He did not vow to take revenge.  Instead Jesus looked to God the Father to be His judge.  When false accusations were hurled His way, He did not need to prove His own innocence to His accusers, instead He showed them love, and trusted His Father to judge Him in all matters. 
Our path is to follow in His footsteps, we are to live loving others and constantly doing good to all men, even to the unjust who have authority over us.  Christ could have ended the Roman rule in one second.  He could have obliterated their infrastructure, killed their armies universally, wiped out their command structure, and established the Jewish nation as the worldwide power on earth.  The Pharisees would have gladly accepted Him if He would have followed that course.  They simply could not understand why someone who “could” do those things would choose not to.  They simply could not understand why He would actually love those soldiers and wish to see them redeemed as well, instead of dead on a battlefield.  Jesus lived here on earth, never making one single move to right the injustices of the Roman Empire.  He fully submitted Himself to Roman laws, even advocating that we pay taxes that we hate to pay.  He freed no slaves from their physical chains.  Instead He offered to free ALL of us slaves, from the chains of sin. 
Peter continues in verse 24 … “Who his own self bare our sins in his own body on the tree, that we, being dead to sins, should live unto righteousness: by whose stripes ye were healed. [verse 25] For ye were as sheep going astray; but are now returned unto the Shepherd and Bishop of your souls.”  Christ elected to endure torture for our sakes.  He submitted to Roman rule, even when that authority was unjustly beating and killing Him.  Even in the face of death, Christ submitted.  And with His endurance of evil, we are to be made free from evil.  We are made free from the chains of sin, by the love of God.  We sheep are returned to our Shepherd’s fold.  Notice here Peter finally attributes a church hierarchy, but ascribes the position of Bishop not to himself, but ONLY to Christ.  All of us are sheep.  We do not lead each other, though we are to submit to each other.  We do not lead the world, but instead are advised for the sake of Christ, to submit to the world.  We have only one leader, only one shepherd.  Peter remembered the counsel of Christ, when Jesus asked Peter to feed His sheep, not to steal the herd.  Peter was to help the sheep find spiritual meat, not to replace Christ as their shepherd.  Peter was called to serve.  We are called to do the same.
If it runs counter to your nature to submit yourself, then look to submit to Christ first.  And understand it is only through His transformation of your heart, that you can reflect the love of Christ and submit yourself to earthly authorities for the sake of Christ.  In so doing, and in reflecting God’s love to those who clearly do not deserve it, that evil will finally meet its end.
And the counsel of Peter to submit was not over yet …
 

Friday, June 26, 2009

Vocal Minority ...


It is hard to over state the power of disruption.  Carrying a train of thought out to a logical conclusion, particularly if it is a new idea, or new way of examining an old subject, is difficult to accomplish in the best of conditions.  But just let a heckler decide to interrupt the proceedings and the progress comes to a crashing halt.  Worse yet, even if order can be restored, it becomes almost impossible to pick up where you left off, forcing either a repeat of the entire concept or the danger in skipping important points on the way to the conclusion.  It only takes a minority of one, to destroy the efforts of many, just one vocal minority.

I was reminded this week watching the news coverage of some of the home-town meetings on the topic of the upcoming Health Care reform efforts, how effective this method is in killing any real progress.  Not only does any point get lost in the shouting, a perception emerges that the loudest point must be the one shared by the most people.  Even though this is hardly ever true, the phrase “the squeaky wheel gets the grease” comes to mind.  In this case, the associated attention that gets centered on the hecklers becomes the prevailing perception of the feelings at the meeting.  Again false, but perception is a hard thing to kill.

I guess it would be O.K., if this sort of thing only occurred in political circles, on political topics where public interest were at stake.  Unfortunately this is not the only venue where these tactics are employed successfully.  I learned from personal experience they can be deployed in church.  Our local church “Central SDA” in Orlando Florida was suffering from an aging population, declining membership, and associated decline in revenue.  Since I was not terribly busy at the time, I decided to write a detailed strategy document on how to turn our trends around.  It was a 35 page fully illustrated strategy document that was embraced by the Pastor, Head Elder, and Head Deacon right away.  The full church board and Ministry leaders then embraced it, and it was recommended for general adoption at a general church business meeting.  I was unaware that these meetings even existed, but nonetheless presented my fully developed PowerPoint presentation as I would have at any of my other board-room style presentations to the general membership of the church.

I have done this kind of thing throughout my career at many client companies.  I was happy this time that my personal business skills could be used in a religious setting to help my local church out.  I know enough how to divert questions and interruptions until the end of my presentations.  But then came the Q&A, and the heckling commenced.  Now I don’t mind at all competing ideas, or arguments over the relevance or effectiveness of a recommendation that I make.  I believe that ideas improve when debated, or discussed from differing perspectives.  I have always had highly diverse executives reporting to me that I believe has increased the quality of the tasks we set out to accomplish.  I assumed this would be no different.  After all this is my “church family”.  I am donating my time, skills, and expenses.  These people are supposed to love me and each other right?  Aaaa … but thank you for playing.

It was not that my ideas were debated for being effective or for relevance.  It was my character under assault.  Somehow an older member of the church who has never even spoken to me, decided I was doing this for selfish reasons – as if I was going to receive a percentage of the increase in our revenues as a church.  I was not, never even entered my mind.  Another member decided my entire document was an apostacy and that I was a blasphemer.  By the way, this member was only in attendance to dispute my document, he never actually attended church here in over 3 years.  And of course, he had never met me, or even talked to me prior to the evening of this presentation.  The spiritual basis for his claims of my evil was based in my call for “tolerance” of the styles of worship that the vast majority of people prefer in the U.S.  (i.e. we should not condemn others simply because we do not care for their style of music, style of worship, etc.).  I was stunned.

In retrospect it is easy to see that the singular personal attacks I endured (without fighting back as I believe this is no venue for it), were from only a very vocal minority.  There were in point of fact only 5 members who decided I was Satan incarnate for my efforts to grow our church.  They had no competing set of ideas.  They only wanted to have total control, without any clue or plan of what to do with it.  Suggesting otherwise by anyone, would have resulted in the same vitriol.  The other 90 people in attendance were far more accepting.  In fact, the vote to approve the plan was over 95% positive.  Despite this, and despite my personal attempts to speak with the disgruntled, the nay’s were undeterred in their efforts to poison what our entire church purposed to do.  Had I been in one of the companies I have managed, I would fired the negativity folks immediately.  There is no room for those determined to see a business fail rather than embrace change in the business world.  But this was God’s house.  He wants everyone, even the stubborn ones, even the wrong ones, even the mean ones, even me …

Heckler’s can destroy the progress of communication.  But nay-sayers can only poison & delay the work, when the work is for the Lord they cannot kill it completely.  Our church grew by over 75 new members in a single year, almost doubling our prior year’s regular attendance.  Our revenues increased, we started new ministries to serve the community, our aging population, and our youth.  We opened a Spanish language ministry still in existence today.  We remodeled and renovated some areas of the church.  In short we grew.  But at each church business meeting, a vocal minority would speak out and criticize our efforts to feed the homeless (“they are nothing but pan-handlers anyway begging for money for drugs and their million dollar homes” … an actual quote by the female head of one of our key ministries for the poor if you can believe that).  They would criticize our music.  Though during the service, even our DVD based music performances would get hearty Amen’s from the congregation – where most of the members loved what we did.

It was really only about the same 5 people who hated everything.  They would not leave the church to find another one, as this would mean admitting defeat to them.  Instead they plotted a take-over.  Here is where the disconnects are so large they hard to comprehend.  I took a leadership role in our church only to help it grow, and because I was the only one who could at the start.  I had no intentions of remaining in charge, nor any desire to remain as a leader.  I served because I felt I must.  But I was eager to put another person in my place and allow me the rest of the lack of the limelight.  But the vocal minority had no idea I thought this way.  Because they craved power, they assumed I must as well.  Had they known I was eager to give it away they could have plotted better than they did.

They moved after covertly gathering intelligence they believed they could use against me.  The information they had was illegally taken, incomplete, and therefore mistaken.  But it mattered not.  I could see what they were doing, and I could see further they were positioning me to fight back and cause the church to split.  But I would not.  Instead I resigned quietly, and cleared my name and reputation with the pastor, and with our conference who had now been called in on what they believed was a scandal.  It really was not.  My quiet enemies acted on incomplete accounting information gathered before month end, without the full set of data.  Auditors established I did nothing wrong and in fact were impressed by how well we had managed our finances.  The conference president and our pastor backed me completely in this.  Yet I was resigning quietly to avoid positioning the church for a split.

I failed.  In one of our last board meetings with me still in office, I was ambushed by one of the five with this mis-information.  His hatred for me was so obvious, and so determined, and so pointed, that he literally turned the entire board angry with him.  Regardless of my actions, the church was positioned to split anyway.  Now the vocal minority set about attempting to paint perceptions as reality, and gain support among the members.  But they failed.  Those that saw what happened to me, realized that I had only ever told the truth.  Those that had been deceived by the hateful minority became genuinely sorry they ever even thought that way, and have since become some of my closest friends.  The church lost 3 of the 5 members that determined to take control.  And again, even though in reality the church did not actually split, the level of noise associated with all this, and the loudness of the vocal minority made it feel as though it had split.

It is always easier to criticize than to create.  It is always easier to tear-down than to build-up.  When I look around me at what goes on in our country, and unfortunately even in the walls of our church, I fear that the vocal minority is drowning out the message of the more tolerant and sane majority.  I have lived through a most unpleasant experience caused by so few, along with the silence of so many.  Had the majority been as vocal as the minority, there would have been no conflict.  But silence amounts to passive consent.  And if we remain silent too long in the face of vocal insanity, we reap the actions of the insane.  I think better to speak out, and speak up in love, and let love have a voice again …