The science of evolution
can trace our ancestry back (chiefly through carbon dating, mostly of rocks)
for thousands, then millions of years. There are many scientific theories
regarding the origin of life on this planet. I say 'theories' because it
is impossible to scientifically 'prove' any of them, despite attributing them
to 'science'. Evolution, in the sense of evolving over time to meet
changing demands of our environment, CAN be proven (i.e. Darwin's original
theories), but this does not grant carte-blanche to the origin of any
biological species that first appeared on our planet.
But to focus on our
world in the context of evolution seems a bit arrogant, when talking about the
meaning of existence. Take the theories back further, all the way to the
big bang; in fact, how about going back even further - prior to the big
bang. Best guess (note we have given up the idea of even theories here,
we're down to guesses), the Hydrogen atom must have ALWAYS existed. It's
mass attracted other atoms through gravity, attracting still more atoms, that
begin to morph over time into other elements, until we get up to the big
bang. But at its source SOMETHING must have always existed, past our
understanding of space, time, and the laws that we understand about matter
itself.
So in the world of
science, the Hydrogen
atom is god. And the 'religion' of science requires
'faith' to cover the questions it cannot answer; such as how do in-animate
atoms come together and spontaneously morph into 'living' ameba. How do
interdependent complex organisms form at precisely the same time through a
process of evolving when neither could exist without the other? Being a
member of this church, leaves one with more troubling evolved questions such
as; when did morality enter the conscience of man's existence, and why does it
not seem to exist in other highly evolved species? And of course, what is
the meaning of life? Why am I here? What does it matter?
I respect the
'purest' thinking of scientific minds that completely reject the concept of a
God. But I point out, that to maintain the purity of scientific thinking
requires 'faith' to cover the unanswered questions. And at its core, this
belief system tends to leave the individual void of any true meaning. The
natural conclusion to the randomness of your particular life leaves you empty
inside. Think of it. Your life, within this thinking, is devoid of
meaning. You could die this second and mean nothing. You could cure
cancer, and be remembered for it, but once your particular existence has
ceased, to you it means nothing. And let's face it, we have FACTUAL
evidence about what happens to us when we die. We disintegrate. We
become dust, bones, nails, and maybe hair, but nothing more after death.
Within the scientific community there is NO afterlife, because the concept of a
soul, implies more than science can explain.
As I said at the outset, it all comes down to random-chance, or
existence that is unique and implies intent …
No comments:
Post a Comment