Friday, January 8, 2021

Changing Church ...

 

Some folks think the “truth” (or the doctrines they hold to) is the perfect defense to keep the church pure, and the way God intends it to be.  Sounds reasonable right?  If what you believe is true, if it is what God wants you to believe, stands to reason your church should be not only the right one, but must be following what God wanted you to do in the first place.  Now there are folks that believe you can mess up a pure church by introducing lets say … the organ, or later, the guitar, or later still the drums, or recently these nauseating repetitive worship music songs (sorry I digress).  But those worship elements are about style, not about the content of what you believe.  So if your hearts are true, then how you worship is more a matter of preference, of style, and of culture.  But if what you believe is still true, it should still be a perfect defense against messing up a pure church.  Again sounds reasonable.  Might be nice to think this.  But it just is not so.  Here is the proof.

The proof this is not so is … wait for it … Pharisees.  Now I know what you are thinking.  You are thinking hey wait a minute, we don’t have any Pharisees in our church.  They are a part of the Jewish religion long since abandoned by Jesus after His death and resurrection.  You are thinking the Pharisees got it all wrong which is why they are no longer a thing.  So how could they be proof of what might be wrong in your church, which is likely a “Christian” church that holds its faith in Jesus?  Well lets go back in time a bit to examine this idea.  In the time up to Christ, and in fact the time during Christ, the Jewish faith, the Jewish religion, was the “right one”.  Lots of modern Christians like to forget that Jesus Himself was Jewish of the lineage of David, tracing back to Abraham, further to Noah, and eventually back to Adam.  But the world was blessed to have Jesus from the bloodline of Abraham, not of the Chinese, or native Americans, or Indians.  Jesus comes to us from people of Jewish bloodline, and Jewish faith.  All the other competing “gods” were no competition at all.  They were all fake news.  The only real God was the Jewish God.  And Jesus was a key part of that Trinity.

So if you lived in the time of Christ, you would find Jesus going to synagogue on Sabbath, keeping His own holy day, reading “the” scriptures to the people who came to learn of God.  The religion was the right one.  The faith was the right one.  So they had perfect doctrines, or perfect beliefs, or so you would think.  The misperception about the role of the Messiah, that He would come as conquering King, instead of the Lamb of God to be sacrificed for our sin.  That misperception was not actually wrong.  It was just not timed properly.  Jesus will come back again, the next time, not as the Lamb to be sacrificed, but as the conquering King the Jewish people had been waiting to see.  So even the doctrine we think they got wrong, was not actually wrong, it was just out of time and sequence.  It will be right.  But it took the coming as Lamb in order to later have the coming as King of Kings and Lord of Lords.  What the Jewish folks got wrong was the timing and the sequence.  And of course they also got wrong “who” the Messiah was and will forever be.

But in the day of Jesus the right church, with the right scriptures, and right faith … still managed to get it wrong.  Pharisees (or church leaders of the day) managed to get it wrong.  The believers also got it wrong.  A good many of those who understood the need for sacrifice as symbols to point forward to the ultimate Lamb of God, figured out a great way to facilitate that need, and make a healthy economic profit in the process.  These lay people, met a need worshippers would have, and in the process made themselves quite rich.  They engaged in currency manipulation (even if only on a local level).  They engaged in profiteering, holding the demands of scripture as the basis for buying and selling what must be bought and sold.  They also had a pretty good kick back ring going with enterprising priests who supplied the meat market with a constant flow of excess sacrifice goods.  After all how much meat could any one priest eat with all the sacrifices going on in Jerusalem on any one given day.  So not only the Pharisees got it wrong, the believers engaged in practices that led them down a dark pathway, until they lost all sight of obedience, or love, of what God truly wanted.

Church needed to change.  It was too far off the path God had intended.  Now the Pharisees would have categorically disagreed with that prognosis.  In fact they became willing to kill God to maintain the status quo.  And frankly the lay folks who occupied the Temple positions where money changed hands moving one currency to another, and buying just the right sacrifice at 4 or 5 times the going rate, or the resulting meat at even higher rates with kick backs to the priesthood – those folks had no desire to see church change.  Do we?  Are we content with the status quo?  Are we perhaps so content to the point of killing any messenger that challenges our notions of our church being the right one, or done the right way, or perhaps that we have found some modern economy that comes from modern worship where we thrive on partitioners offerings?  I look at Papal cathedrals and see wealth beyond most folks imagining.  I see mega churches like the ones pastored by Joel Osteen, or others like him, that preach a gospel of success.  And I wonder, is our modern Christian economy based on wealth as the certain sign of God’s favor?  That is precisely what the Pharisees believed as well.

Luke writes about the need to change church, even the right one, as God sees fit from time to time.  No church is immune.  No church exempt.  No church without the need to shake it up, sometimes even with significant force, to get it back on the path.  This is not just big church thing, or something for “those people’s” denominations, it can be for everyone at different times.  Is it time again?  Luke picks up the original story back in chapter 19 and verse 45 saying … “And he went into the temple, and began to cast out them that sold therein, and them that bought; [verse 46] Saying unto them, It is written, My house is the house of prayer: but ye have made it a den of thieves.” My house should be a house of prayer according to Jesus.  Is ours?  How much do we really pray in our worship services?  We do some.  But as a percentage of the time we spend there is it really even significant?  We sing quite a bit.  You would think Jesus marched in there demanding to see the choir, and the band, and the retinue of worship music that can take as much as 30-45 minutes of a weekly service.  He didn’t.  He never even mentioned music at all.  Does that mean Jesus hates music?  No.  It just means His house is not supposed to be known as the concert hall.  And His worship not known as the “music experience”.  But instead to be known as the “prayer place”.

Further Jesus goes on to say the entire “worship economy” the folks of His day had set up, was nothing more than the theft of blessing from the hearts of the people, while at the same time, the theft of their wallets and purses.  The right faith does not protect you from greed.  The right scriptures no insulation from corruption that goes unchallenged.  An unreformed heart will steal without even acknowledging it is doing so.  How many “ministers” of the church are well paid for services that many do for free in small churches, or have volunteered to do in times past, as a gift back to God.  And these modern ministers think nothing of being paid now for what they do, quoting Paul as the minister is worth his pay.  We see nothing wrong with it.  We have setup a modern economy from the worship of God.  We sell CD’s and make DVD’s of religious content in order that musical and video ministries can be paid for and maintained.  Donors think nothing of it.  And those who are paid by those donations worry only that there is enough of them to be paid, perhaps paid well.  We too have a “worship economy”.  Are we ready to be shaken up by Jesus over it?  Will we respond any different than the Pharisees did?

Luke continues in verse 47 saying … “And he taught daily in the temple. But the chief priests and the scribes and the chief of the people sought to destroy him, [verse 48] And could not find what they might do: for all the people were very attentive to hear him.  What was the result of what Jesus did?  The leaders seeking to preserve the status quo, to preserve their own version of a worship economy, were ready to kill Jesus to keep it going.  But the people wanted to hear their own scriptures taught with a new lens of love upon them.  For the first time, scripture is taught without corruption.  Jesus asks them for no money.  He does not offer to sing for hours on end.  Nor to spend His time doing the hundred other traditional things we do at weekly services to fill the time, and order the service.  Instead He teaches right out of the Bible, but right through what God the Father intended to show, uninfluenced by money, or power, or greed of any kind.  Jesus did not teach a gospel of success, nor of hardship, but only of love and longsuffering.  He taught the people what they needed to hear, to believe, and to see for their own salvation.  How God and now He alone could save them from themselves.  And the people could not get enough of it.  They craved this new truth coming from old scriptures they had heard recited a number of times before but never with this message of total love.

So where does this leave us.  What if we changed the nature of our church buildings to be mere places where prayer to God could be offered, privately, or in tandem?  That might destroy our worship economy entirely.  It does not mean we stop singing, but it might change where we do it, and why.  What if worship services became more like classes teaching scripture through the lens of Jesus in small groups, perhaps in the homes of folks who wanted to learn, and by fellow believers, or deacons, or elders, or deaconesses?  What if those classes happened well outside of the Sabbath time constraints, but as often as time allowed, or better stated, as often as we prioritized it.  What if offering was no longer a part of that equation.  Or what if offering was truly repurposed to give only to the poor, or those victims of disaster, or those in need right next to us.  What if we sang at the top of our lungs … in our cars … not the latest pop song, but the worship music we enjoy whatever genre that happens to be in.  What if we broke down the mega church concept into the small community concept where believers truly get to know each other and begin to meet each others needs because we want to, in fact, we cannot stop ourselves from doing it.  We are just too driven to love others, all others, those in “church”, and those who would not be caught dead in “church”.

Jesus took church to the people where they were.  He ate with hookers, tax collectors, and folks of public ill repute.  He took healing to those in need of every disease, even the lethal ones, through the power of God the Father.  He took it for free.  He healed folks who had no faith before that event in their lives.  Faith came from the encounters with Jesus, it was not demanded first.  Jesus focused church on people, not on buildings.  Jesus did not worry about “working for a living” or being paid for His ministerial work.  Time for another shake up.  A shake up of who we are and how we think worship is supposed to be.  I hope we don’t try to kill Him for this realization.  I hope we cant get enough of it.

 

No comments:

Post a Comment