Saturday, January 16, 2021

When Truth Confronts Pride ...


Pick any heavyweight boxer you can think of, and for a time at least, they think of themselves as the “greatest” fighter that ever lived.  They talk about this stature in the press nearly as often as they are handed a microphone.  And this boast may even seem true, at least for a while.  But inevitably, time demonstrates that “for a while” is as good as that boast will ever be.  At some point, a challenger comes along that wins the title fight, and notches a loss in that once proud fighter’s column.  Then begins a desperate scramble for a rematch or three, to regain what was lost.  Even if it is regained, time presents as an unstoppable enemy, and with it more challengers that one after another take that title away, and prove the once invulnerable fighter is no longer the greatest.  Mike Tyson might fall into this category.  At his prime he was nearly unstoppable.  He hit so hard, fights rarely made it out of the first round, or first few hits to his opponent.  But over time, came Evander Holyfield, and the realization that he might actually lose that fight.  So Mike resorts to biting an ear and ending the fight through disqualification before he loses it through skill he cannot defeat.  Truth confronts pride, and pride refuses to submit.

But this phenomenon is not just restricted to sports, or boxing.  It infects the church.  It comes in a different package but with all the same fundamentals elements in place.  In the time of Christ, doctrines were determined by Pharisees.  Doctrines were thought to be unalterable, and common truth.  So Jesus should have just accepted them as they were.  If Jesus had done that, He would have tacitly accepted the authority of the Pharisees over His own church, and made them happy, happy enough to leave Jesus alone, perhaps even hail Him as their Messiah as well.  But to challenge those doctrines, would not just challenge the teachings, but challenge the pride behind them.  Now, inside the one true church itself, before the crucifixion, would come the confrontation between the Truth, and what men believed, and the pride they took in those beliefs.  Pride that would refuse to yield.  Pride that would rather kill our God, than yield.  And we look backwards and scold the Pharisees for what they did, but refuse to look in our mirrors to see if that same behavior still exists within us today.

Consider for a moment what happens when the Truth of scripture confronts the reality of where and when and how we live.  Conservative Christians decry the acceptance of homosexuality into the church, while at the same time never figuring out an effective ministry to those who suffer from that particular condition.  There is plenty of rejection in conservative Christian circles based on Biblical teachings that are quite clear.  But there is zero ministry to these people who need our love every bit as much as those who suffer from other variants of sexual expression that are equaling as disturbing to our God.  Adultery is every bit as big a problem as homosexuality will ever be.  And adultery happens quietly, not talked about, not admitted to, and completely infects that same conservative Christian community that is so quick to condemn people whose propensities they do not share.  Easy to condemn the gay person for being gay, when I have no desire to ever be gay.  But hard to condemn my own lusts, that drive me to forever look away from marital bonds I should be bound to.  Men who will not forsake the pursuit of variety.  Women who will not forsake the pursuit of satisfaction or love from a source that is not their own husband, having given up hope they will ever find it there.  And this more quiet problem, is a much more prevalent problem, that it seems nearly none of us are willing to confront, or sadly forsake.

The cure for both of these sins remains Jesus.  And both sins are a disease of the mind and heart.  Both are sins whether we would prefer to hear that designation or not.  The answer is not to “accept” them as part of who we are.  The answer is to submit ourselves fully to Jesus, and let Him do with our sex life whatever and however He sees fit.  And to love each other without condemnation of each other in the meantime while Jesus does the work within us, only Jesus could ever do.  If I arrive at the Pearly gates and my sin was never fully removed from me during my lifetime, it will be removed before I enter those gates, by the grace and love of Jesus Christ.  Many a believer has gone down to the grave, still struggling against some sin they never found the victory against.  Forgiveness was ever their watchword even if reform was the one they always desired, but did not find enough submission to Jesus, to ever experience.  But transformation will happen.  Faith guarantees it.  Whether in this life where relief comes early to the burdened soul, or at the start of the next one, when it comes in the twinkling of an eye – transformation will come.  And Jesus will make us then, what He always desired for us to be.  The truth however, does not change, and confronts our pride in the here and now.  Do we try to accept ourselves giving us license to sin, or ever look to Jesus and have faith He can remove our sins from us, and change who we are, and what we want.

Will we be like the Pharisees of old, and cling to our pride, even to the point of denying the Truth, and rather seeking to kill God Himself over it?  Or will be react another way.  Consider what Luke tells us of an incident regarding the confrontation of pride with the Truth in the person of Jesus Christ.  This story begins not long after the triumphal entry of Jesus into Jerusalem on a colt that was never ridden by any other man.  The anthems of praise echoed through the city and refused to go away, even days after Jesus had entered.  Jesus had cleansed the Temple, and thrown out the cheaters, breaking entirely the worship based economy that emerged within it.  And now, Jesus was teaching in the Temple day after day.  But Jesus did not teach in the manner of previous priests or current Pharisees.  Jesus taught with power and authority.  Jesus did not explain a passage from scripture and talk about what it might have meant, or all the possible meanings it might have contained.  Jesus simple zoned in on the truth of what it said, and what it meant, and what God the Father intended us to learn from every given passage of scripture.  Scriptures were never thrown out by Jesus, but instead explained through the lens of Jesus, and finally rightly interpreted.  This was teaching with authority, authority like none other in history.  It was clear.  It was decisive.  It was direct.  It was Truth as it proceeded from the mouth of the Truth.  … and the Pharisees hated it.

Eventually they reached a breaking point and could keep silent no longer.  Luke picks up with this in the twentieth chapter of his gospel letter to his friend about what we believe and why.  In verse 1 it says … “And it came to pass, that on one of those days, as he taught the people in the temple, and preached the gospel, the chief priests and the scribes came upon him with the elders, [verse 2] And spake unto him, saying, Tell us, by what authority doest thou these things? or who is he that gave thee this authority?  The Pharisees demanded to know, who gave Jesus the authority to teach what and how He did.  They knew it was not the Sanhedrin.  They were the Sanhedrin.  They knew Rome would never insert itself into these kinds of inherently Jewish teachings.  So that left only one choice.  Jesus must declare the His Father God granted Him this authority.  Or better yet for the Pharisees, Jesus might even declare that He gave Himself this authority, for that would be an admission that He thought of Himself as God.  Either declaration of God granting Jesus this authority, might be enough to convince the people that Jesus was a blasphemer.  Saying you are God when you are not is indeed blasphemy.  But the Pharisees knew Jesus was in fact God.  So if Jesus had declared Himself as such, it would have been true.  The Pharisees must then convince the people that truth spoken by Jesus was a lie, and they should stone Jesus for having the nerve to speak it.

This was no simple question of curiosity launched by the Pharisees.  It was a calculated attack designed to trap Jesus into giving them an excuse to discredit Him with the people, and an occasion to stone Him for so doing.  Think of the depth of hatred pride had inspired in these men, to pervert truth in order to commit murder, of God Himself and they knew it.  Notice too, they did not attack the Truth of the messages Jesus had been teaching.  They engaged in no debate with Him about what He had been saying.  For there was no debate.  What Jesus said was pure truth, and they recognized it, and had no debate they could launch.  So instead of debating scripture with Jesus, which they knew they would lose, they challenged His authority to be able to teach at all.  This was after all, “their” Temple.  From their point of view, Jesus did not own this place, it belonged to the people was managed by them, not Jesus.  So Jesus should not have been teaching at all without their blessing.  A blessing they would never give.  So here was a trap disguised as a question to challenge His authority.

Jesus however, saw right through the subterfuge into the hearts of each of them present offering this challenge.  Jesus knew immediately what they were doing, and why.  He saw the hate barely able to contain itself.  He saw the thirst for blood, that pride confronted by truth, was ready to shed.  And are we any different than those Pharisees?  When scripture tells us clearly not to cheat, not to betray, and we do it anyway – don’t we tend to just ignore scripture entirely?  We kind of have to, in order to keep doing what we are doing.  We get mad at anyone who would dare confront us with what scripture might say to us.  We attack them, attack their character, point out their sins, and less than perfect lives.  Who are they to tell us anything?  But the truth in scripture does not change because its messenger is less than perfect.  Yet we war against truth, in order for us to remain in sin, and refuse to call sin by its right name.  For if it is not sin, then we do not need forgiveness, and do not need to change.  Our pride can remain in tact if we do not need to be saved from ourselves.  But that is not the truth of it.  We do need to be saved.  Saved from who we are in the core of us.

Jesus responds in verse 3 saying … “And he answered and said unto them, I will also ask you one thing; and answer me: [verse 4] The baptism of John, was it from heaven, or of men?  How would you answer?  I put this same challenge to your pride to you in a different way.  The Bible; is it of God or of men?  If you answer it is of God, then why do you not believe it, or do what it says.  If you answer it is of men, then what hope is left to you at all?  This was the same dilemma the Pharisees faced.  But they, like you, already knew the truth of the answer to this question.  John’s baptism, and the Bible from Genesis to Revelations, is of God, or of heaven.  We were created, we did not evolve.  Jesus is revealed in prophecy of things yet to be.  We can learn from those revelations or choose to ignore them at our peril.  John’s baptism was as relevant then as it is now.  We need a baptism of repentance.  Notice we do not need a baptism to profess our faith in Jesus, we need a baptism of repentance of who we are, of what we have made of ourselves by our own choices to embrace sin.  We need to be washed clean by ceremonial waters, with our eyes fixed on Jesus who washes us clean before the Father.  This we need.  But so few churches offer it this way.  Instead baptism is made a ceremonial right of joining a particular denomination of Jesus, and done only once.  I dare say our need for repentance exceeds a one-time event.  I imagine even in the days of John, the same believer might have showed up at the river Jordan more than once.

The Pharisees now began to see their own dilemma.  Luke continues in verse 5 saying … “And they reasoned with themselves, saying, If we shall say, From heaven; he will say, Why then believed ye him not? [verse 6] But and if we say, Of men; all the people will stone us: for they be persuaded that John was a prophet.  Keep in mind, the Pharisees knew the truth, but pride would not allow them to acknowledge it.  For John had called them out on their misdeeds and hypocrisy.  And instead of seeking repentance when those warning were offered, they rebelled further still.  No Pharisee had taken that baptism (at least not in public).  Instead they thought themselves in no need of it.  Are we any different?  Do we cast a purposely blind eye to our own sins, focusing only on the sins of others.  We think ourselves as “good people”, particular good if you compare us to those people, and that guy over there.  So if we are good, we do not really need to repent at all, let alone have a baptism to acknowledge publicly we needed repentance.  Pride would have us refuse any opportunity to be saved, for pride would tell us we do not need saving, especially from who we have become.

Luke continues in verse 7 saying … “And they answered, that they could not tell whence it was. [verse 8] And Jesus said unto them, Neither tell I you by what authority I do these things.  Mexican standoff.  The Pharisees will not admit they know the truth, or need repentance, or need to be saved.  And Jesus will not stumble into the trap they have for Him.  But Jesus never strayed from the truth, or changed what He taught, or how, for Jesus is the Truth.  The Pharisees however, allowed pride to keep them from the Truth at all costs.  And determined themselves even more to kill this Truth as soon as they could find a way.  Are we any different?  Are we willing to be broken upon the Rock of Jesus Christ, having our pride shattered completely so that only humility, even public humility, is all that remains?  It is not easy picking up from the aftermath of having embraced sin of any kind.  What you thought was private, turns out to be not so private after all.  You hurt others.  Your betrayal shatters the hearts and minds of others, most chiefly of those you love the most, or say you do.  And even when forgiven you bear the burden of what you have done, for the pain does not quickly go out of their hearts and minds and lives. It will scar you.  Perhaps it should scar you.  But you cannot be rebuilt upon a foundation of lies.  You cannot find your way past the pain while you seek no repentance.  You cannot be forgiven while you do not seek it.

Sin is devastating.  But to allow pride to tell you, you do not sin, is even worse.  To allow pride to minimize what you do or how or why you do it, is no better.  The pain you cause will be amplified instead of released.  Jesus was and remains the Truth we all need, we all require.  It is Jesus alone who can rebuild our shattered lives.  It is our pride that would lead us to destroy ourselves, and all those we claim to love.  But to be confronted by the Truth of Jesus and seek repentance is the first step in a long journey back to living a whole life Jesus intends for you.  It is only in your humility that you begin to understand just how large forgiveness really is, and how expensive it was to purchase and give to you.  It is when we acknowledge who we are, that we begin to see, why we need to be remade from that old person into the creation Jesus would have us to be.  And while we may ever see the pain of what we have done reflected in the eyes or life of another, we can set our minds and hearts firm, to make amends.  To serve our victims for the rest of our lives, and show them what the love of Jesus can do to heal, and make well again.  Lives need not remain shattered by Truth, but cannot be rebuilt until they are.  Then we begin to move from mere repentance, to real reform, and this is how perfection begins in you.

 

Friday, January 8, 2021

Changing Church ...

 

Some folks think the “truth” (or the doctrines they hold to) is the perfect defense to keep the church pure, and the way God intends it to be.  Sounds reasonable right?  If what you believe is true, if it is what God wants you to believe, stands to reason your church should be not only the right one, but must be following what God wanted you to do in the first place.  Now there are folks that believe you can mess up a pure church by introducing lets say … the organ, or later, the guitar, or later still the drums, or recently these nauseating repetitive worship music songs (sorry I digress).  But those worship elements are about style, not about the content of what you believe.  So if your hearts are true, then how you worship is more a matter of preference, of style, and of culture.  But if what you believe is still true, it should still be a perfect defense against messing up a pure church.  Again sounds reasonable.  Might be nice to think this.  But it just is not so.  Here is the proof.

The proof this is not so is … wait for it … Pharisees.  Now I know what you are thinking.  You are thinking hey wait a minute, we don’t have any Pharisees in our church.  They are a part of the Jewish religion long since abandoned by Jesus after His death and resurrection.  You are thinking the Pharisees got it all wrong which is why they are no longer a thing.  So how could they be proof of what might be wrong in your church, which is likely a “Christian” church that holds its faith in Jesus?  Well lets go back in time a bit to examine this idea.  In the time up to Christ, and in fact the time during Christ, the Jewish faith, the Jewish religion, was the “right one”.  Lots of modern Christians like to forget that Jesus Himself was Jewish of the lineage of David, tracing back to Abraham, further to Noah, and eventually back to Adam.  But the world was blessed to have Jesus from the bloodline of Abraham, not of the Chinese, or native Americans, or Indians.  Jesus comes to us from people of Jewish bloodline, and Jewish faith.  All the other competing “gods” were no competition at all.  They were all fake news.  The only real God was the Jewish God.  And Jesus was a key part of that Trinity.

So if you lived in the time of Christ, you would find Jesus going to synagogue on Sabbath, keeping His own holy day, reading “the” scriptures to the people who came to learn of God.  The religion was the right one.  The faith was the right one.  So they had perfect doctrines, or perfect beliefs, or so you would think.  The misperception about the role of the Messiah, that He would come as conquering King, instead of the Lamb of God to be sacrificed for our sin.  That misperception was not actually wrong.  It was just not timed properly.  Jesus will come back again, the next time, not as the Lamb to be sacrificed, but as the conquering King the Jewish people had been waiting to see.  So even the doctrine we think they got wrong, was not actually wrong, it was just out of time and sequence.  It will be right.  But it took the coming as Lamb in order to later have the coming as King of Kings and Lord of Lords.  What the Jewish folks got wrong was the timing and the sequence.  And of course they also got wrong “who” the Messiah was and will forever be.

But in the day of Jesus the right church, with the right scriptures, and right faith … still managed to get it wrong.  Pharisees (or church leaders of the day) managed to get it wrong.  The believers also got it wrong.  A good many of those who understood the need for sacrifice as symbols to point forward to the ultimate Lamb of God, figured out a great way to facilitate that need, and make a healthy economic profit in the process.  These lay people, met a need worshippers would have, and in the process made themselves quite rich.  They engaged in currency manipulation (even if only on a local level).  They engaged in profiteering, holding the demands of scripture as the basis for buying and selling what must be bought and sold.  They also had a pretty good kick back ring going with enterprising priests who supplied the meat market with a constant flow of excess sacrifice goods.  After all how much meat could any one priest eat with all the sacrifices going on in Jerusalem on any one given day.  So not only the Pharisees got it wrong, the believers engaged in practices that led them down a dark pathway, until they lost all sight of obedience, or love, of what God truly wanted.

Church needed to change.  It was too far off the path God had intended.  Now the Pharisees would have categorically disagreed with that prognosis.  In fact they became willing to kill God to maintain the status quo.  And frankly the lay folks who occupied the Temple positions where money changed hands moving one currency to another, and buying just the right sacrifice at 4 or 5 times the going rate, or the resulting meat at even higher rates with kick backs to the priesthood – those folks had no desire to see church change.  Do we?  Are we content with the status quo?  Are we perhaps so content to the point of killing any messenger that challenges our notions of our church being the right one, or done the right way, or perhaps that we have found some modern economy that comes from modern worship where we thrive on partitioners offerings?  I look at Papal cathedrals and see wealth beyond most folks imagining.  I see mega churches like the ones pastored by Joel Osteen, or others like him, that preach a gospel of success.  And I wonder, is our modern Christian economy based on wealth as the certain sign of God’s favor?  That is precisely what the Pharisees believed as well.

Luke writes about the need to change church, even the right one, as God sees fit from time to time.  No church is immune.  No church exempt.  No church without the need to shake it up, sometimes even with significant force, to get it back on the path.  This is not just big church thing, or something for “those people’s” denominations, it can be for everyone at different times.  Is it time again?  Luke picks up the original story back in chapter 19 and verse 45 saying … “And he went into the temple, and began to cast out them that sold therein, and them that bought; [verse 46] Saying unto them, It is written, My house is the house of prayer: but ye have made it a den of thieves.” My house should be a house of prayer according to Jesus.  Is ours?  How much do we really pray in our worship services?  We do some.  But as a percentage of the time we spend there is it really even significant?  We sing quite a bit.  You would think Jesus marched in there demanding to see the choir, and the band, and the retinue of worship music that can take as much as 30-45 minutes of a weekly service.  He didn’t.  He never even mentioned music at all.  Does that mean Jesus hates music?  No.  It just means His house is not supposed to be known as the concert hall.  And His worship not known as the “music experience”.  But instead to be known as the “prayer place”.

Further Jesus goes on to say the entire “worship economy” the folks of His day had set up, was nothing more than the theft of blessing from the hearts of the people, while at the same time, the theft of their wallets and purses.  The right faith does not protect you from greed.  The right scriptures no insulation from corruption that goes unchallenged.  An unreformed heart will steal without even acknowledging it is doing so.  How many “ministers” of the church are well paid for services that many do for free in small churches, or have volunteered to do in times past, as a gift back to God.  And these modern ministers think nothing of being paid now for what they do, quoting Paul as the minister is worth his pay.  We see nothing wrong with it.  We have setup a modern economy from the worship of God.  We sell CD’s and make DVD’s of religious content in order that musical and video ministries can be paid for and maintained.  Donors think nothing of it.  And those who are paid by those donations worry only that there is enough of them to be paid, perhaps paid well.  We too have a “worship economy”.  Are we ready to be shaken up by Jesus over it?  Will we respond any different than the Pharisees did?

Luke continues in verse 47 saying … “And he taught daily in the temple. But the chief priests and the scribes and the chief of the people sought to destroy him, [verse 48] And could not find what they might do: for all the people were very attentive to hear him.  What was the result of what Jesus did?  The leaders seeking to preserve the status quo, to preserve their own version of a worship economy, were ready to kill Jesus to keep it going.  But the people wanted to hear their own scriptures taught with a new lens of love upon them.  For the first time, scripture is taught without corruption.  Jesus asks them for no money.  He does not offer to sing for hours on end.  Nor to spend His time doing the hundred other traditional things we do at weekly services to fill the time, and order the service.  Instead He teaches right out of the Bible, but right through what God the Father intended to show, uninfluenced by money, or power, or greed of any kind.  Jesus did not teach a gospel of success, nor of hardship, but only of love and longsuffering.  He taught the people what they needed to hear, to believe, and to see for their own salvation.  How God and now He alone could save them from themselves.  And the people could not get enough of it.  They craved this new truth coming from old scriptures they had heard recited a number of times before but never with this message of total love.

So where does this leave us.  What if we changed the nature of our church buildings to be mere places where prayer to God could be offered, privately, or in tandem?  That might destroy our worship economy entirely.  It does not mean we stop singing, but it might change where we do it, and why.  What if worship services became more like classes teaching scripture through the lens of Jesus in small groups, perhaps in the homes of folks who wanted to learn, and by fellow believers, or deacons, or elders, or deaconesses?  What if those classes happened well outside of the Sabbath time constraints, but as often as time allowed, or better stated, as often as we prioritized it.  What if offering was no longer a part of that equation.  Or what if offering was truly repurposed to give only to the poor, or those victims of disaster, or those in need right next to us.  What if we sang at the top of our lungs … in our cars … not the latest pop song, but the worship music we enjoy whatever genre that happens to be in.  What if we broke down the mega church concept into the small community concept where believers truly get to know each other and begin to meet each others needs because we want to, in fact, we cannot stop ourselves from doing it.  We are just too driven to love others, all others, those in “church”, and those who would not be caught dead in “church”.

Jesus took church to the people where they were.  He ate with hookers, tax collectors, and folks of public ill repute.  He took healing to those in need of every disease, even the lethal ones, through the power of God the Father.  He took it for free.  He healed folks who had no faith before that event in their lives.  Faith came from the encounters with Jesus, it was not demanded first.  Jesus focused church on people, not on buildings.  Jesus did not worry about “working for a living” or being paid for His ministerial work.  Time for another shake up.  A shake up of who we are and how we think worship is supposed to be.  I hope we don’t try to kill Him for this realization.  I hope we cant get enough of it.