Your ideas, your perspective influenced by your own history,
give you a unique take on any story you may become familiar with. The core elements of the story may be the
same. But what you pay attention to, the
things that are important to you, or that you zero-in-on during the revelation
of the story – well those come from who you are, and what matters to you. You notice subtle things that might have gone
un-noticed by others. Again, the core
elements of the story being the same for everyone. Your unique perspective of the story is
something to cherish. It does not
belittle the story, it rather amplifies it.
And sharing your perspective with others, you are bound to pick up new
things, that they paid more attention to, that may have slipped by you. A sharing of perspectives then, adds to the
wealth of the story, without tearing down the core elements of it. This is what is meant by the phrase “the body
of Christ” as it refers to His church.
We all have different strengths and weaknesses. We all have different perspectives. Jesus is the same. But what we see in Jesus, is often a function
of what we are looking for, and how Jesus uniquely helps each of us. Jesus is still True. But how we see Jesus may differ widely,
because the difference between you and me may also be a wide one.
Unbelievers will sometimes take our differences in
perspective as reason to say Jesus is not true at all. But that is like saying that a story reported
by CNN, MSNBC, and FOX must also not be true at all because those networks come
from different perspectives and often report widely different conclusions based
on the same set of facts (the story itself).
That is ridiculous. We all know
there is a story out there. And in the
case of our news networks, we tend to have one we prefer, and one we do not. We tend to side with the network we prefer
more, and take the one we don’t with a grain of salt. The story is there, the set of facts is out there,
but how it is reported, and how it is received is more a function of who we
listen to, and what we believe to be true.
I would bet, that if you personally were exposed to the entire core set
of facts about a given story, you would see some elements of it reported by
CNN, different ones by MSNBC, and still others reported by FOX. None of the networks are lying per se, but
their perspectives will certainly alter what conclusions they draw; and
therefore what they would like you to draw with them. But the Truth is bigger than CNN, bigger than
MSNBC, and bigger than FOX. And in the
case of Jesus Christ, way bigger than all our news networks, and way bigger
than us.
So given this, I would like to focus on a story recorded in
three gospels. You will hear it from
three different authors, that is three different witnesses. The core elements of the story are the
same. But how it is reported is
different. Perspectives of the authors
were different. And to be fair, what you
or I pay attention to is likely to be different still. These differences in scripture are not proof
that the Bible cannot be true. Far from
it. Instead they prove the reality of
the Bible in reporting a story where the core elements are true, but the three
authors were not copying each other, or lying, that any story like this took
place in the first place. They simply
come at it from three different perspectives.
And you or I, the readers, are likely to gain different insights because
what Jesus means to us, will likely cause us to focus on a unique insight from
the same story in the first place.
The core elements are these.
A person who is mighty, and valued, and important has a need. The influential person is not a Jew. This person knows someone he loves who is
sick and he needs Jesus to heal him. The
influential person does not feel worthy enough to have Jesus come under his
roof. So he asks Jesus to simply speak
the words and the one he loves is healed and made whole. This example of faith in Jesus by someone who
is NOT a Jew, is an example of faith in peoples like ourselves of a future much
different than the past. If you have
been a Christian for some length of time, you will likely recognize some
version of this story from the New Testament.
Some folks call this a “Centurion’s Great Faith”. Others might call this “Jesus Heals an
Official’s Son”. But even these titles
are examples of perspectives. While we
take a second look at this story try to keep an open mind to absorb an even
greater understanding of the story from 3 different witnesses. The scriptures can be found in Luke 7:1-10
… Matthew 8:5-13 … and John 4:43-54.
Backstory:
o
Matthew -
records this incident right after a healing of a leper. He then puts Jesus simply entering
Capernaum.
o
Luke - records this incident right after
the greatest sermon ever preached. He
then puts Jesus simply entering Capernaum.
o
John - records
this incident right after an unpleasant greeting in His home country. But John adds that Jesus attended a feast in Jerusalem,
then travels to Cana (where Jesus had previously turned water into wine).
Protagonist:
o
Matthew -
identifies the influential person as a Roman Centurion and offers no more than
that. Matthew records the encounter as a
one-on-one with Jesus.
o
Luke - identifies the influential person
as a Roman Centurion. Luke differs from
a one-on-one encounter, saying that the Centurion sought out the elders of the
Jews to go to Jesus to ask Him for the healing.
Luke adds that the Jews did this, because the Roman was responsible for
building a Synagogue in their area for them to worship in, and they believed
the Roman loved their nation. Luke
continues that on hearing this Jesus begins to make His way towards the Roman
Centurion’s home.
o
John - identifies
the influential person as only a Nobleman.
John does not seem to see anything noticeably Roman about this person at
all, and he too records a one-on-one encounter between himself and Jesus.
Victim:
o
Matthew –
identifies the victim as a servant of the Centurion who is sick of the palsy
and grievously tormented.
o
Luke – identifies the victim as a servant
who was dear to him, but sick and ready to die.
o
John – identifies
the victim as a son of the Nobleman who was sick and at the point of death.
The Request:
o
Matthew –
records the interaction by the Roman stating his own unworthiness for Jesus to
enter under his roof. The Roman states
that he has men under his own command, that obey his orders and do what he
says. He asks Jesus to merely give
orders for his servant to be healed and he will be.
o
Luke – records that since Jesus was
traveling to the Centurions house after the elder’s first encounter, the
Centurion sends friends out next to tell Jesus not to trouble Himself. For the Roman is not worthy to have Jesus
enter under his roof, nor was the Roman worthy of coming to Jesus himself to
ask this. It is at this point that like
Matthew’s version, the Roman’s message through his friends is the same about
giving orders and they will be obeyed.
o
John – records
the Nobleman coming to Jesus in person asking Him to heal his son. However in John’s version the Nobleman is
requesting for Jesus to come heal his son in person.
The
Response:
o
Matthew –
records Jesus marveling at the Roman’s faith.
Jesus says about it “Verily I say unto you, I have not found so great a
faith, no, not in Israel. And I say unto
you, That many shall come from the east and west and shall sit down with
Abraham, and Isaac, and Jacob, in the kingdom of heaven. But the children of the kingdom shall be cast
out into outer darkness: there shall be weeping and gnashing of teeth.” Then Jesus tells the Centurion to go his way,
as he has believed, so be it done unto thee.
o
Luke – records Jesus marveling at the
Roman’s faith. Jesus says to the people
following …”I say unto you, I have not found so great faith, no, not in Israel.”
o
John – records
the incident differently, he has Jesus saying “Except ye see signs and wonders,
ye will not believe.” But Jesus tells
the Nobleman to go his way. For his son liveth.
The
Results:
o
Matthew –
records the servant was healed in the self-same hour.
o
Luke – records the friends of the
Centurion returning to find the servant whole who had been sick.
o
John – records
the Nobleman returning to a healed son.
He then asks the servants about what time did the son begin to heal
(what hour). They tell him it was about
the seventh hour of the day. This act
converts not only the Nobleman, but his entire household. And John records it as the second Miracle
that Jesus did in Galilee.
There are some subtle and some distinct differences in these
3 versions of the same story in the life of Jesus and the life of this
influential person. First it is possible
that a Roman Centurion was also a Nobleman with some degree of wealth and
influence so perhaps that is less of a difference than first thought. Luke adds the context of having this Roman
building a Synagogue for the people. Next
it is possible that the victim was either a son, or a servant loved as much as
a son might be. So again, perhaps less
of a difference. Whether the Roman
personally interacted with Jesus as Matthew and John state, or whether he sent
emissaries to interact with Jesus on his behalf; what is common is a great
feeling of unworthiness on his part.
Luke extends this unworthiness not to even encounter Jesus
personally. In all three cases, this man
of influence realized his wealth did not make him a saint. Perhaps it only added to his own
unworthiness. What is also common among
all three stories is that Jesus need only speak the words to have the servant/son
healed and he was.
Matthew reminds his audience (the Hebrews) that they will
not be alone in the kingdom of heaven.
There will be many of us there from the east and west as well. Jesus reminds his audience in both Matthew
and Luke that this faith was very great, and it did not come from a
Hebrew. John uses this incident to
remind his audience (the Greeks) that entire households were converted from a
single encounter with Jesus. Not just
the poor and desperate, but the wealthy and influential as well. The core elements of the story remain largely
the same. You have heard the story from
the perspective of three different witnesses.
But what about you? What does
this story say to you? What do you get
out of it?
For me, it tells me of faith coming from unexpected places,
from a people or person, I might have otherwise thought would never be even
interested in Jesus, let alone have so much faith in Him. Keep in mind Romans were hated in their day,
with reason. Yet here is one in perfect
submission to Jesus Christ. This story
also tells me that birthright (that is, being raised in the church) is not the
same thing as a living faith that grows everyday. This was a Centurion who had this faith, not
a Rabbi, not even a disciple. This story
reminds me that as close as we get to Jesus, the more unworthy our assessment
of ourselves becomes. As we see His
perfection, we begin to see our own unworthiness more clearly. It is easy for me to generalize and think of
myself as a good person. But when I see
through the mirror of Jesus, I realize I am not worthy of His forgiveness or
His love. Yet He offers me both anyway. I realize too, there are too many things in
my home that might keep a perfect God out, and worse, too many things in my
heart that do the same. This Roman
Centurion seemed to understand this truth better than I do.
I so appreciate having the perspectives of these three
witnesses on this incident. I love the
additional context each of them offer.
It renews my faith in scripture, and adds to the beauty of my Lord. I hope when you read your Bible, you always
do it through the lens of Jesus Christ, and through that lens find the love God
offers you, and me, everyday.
No comments:
Post a Comment